About

WE PROMOTE AND IMPROVE VACCINE SAFETY

For more than 20 years, our global community of vaccine safety experts has established standardized, validated, and objective methods to support the development of safe vaccines.

MISSION

We enhance the science of vaccine research by providing standardized, validated, and objective methods for monitoring safety profiles and benefit-to-risk ratios of vaccines.

VISION

We envision the safest, most effective vaccines based on rigorous science.

STRATEGY

We bring together committed stakeholders, protect scientific independence, facilitate knowledge transfer across different sectors, locations, and professions, and support vaccine safety experts.

Safe Vaccines

Safest, most effective vaccines based on rigorous science.

Quality Data

Enhance the science of vaccine research, by providing standardised, validated and objective methods for monitoring safety profiles and benefit to risk ratios of vaccines.

Global Collaboration

Bring together committed stakeholders, protect scientific independence, facilitate knowledge transfer across different sectors, locations and profession and support vaccine safety experts.

Mission

The mission of Brighton Collaboration is to provide the best available scientific evidence on the safety of CEPI vaccines to support timely benefit-risk assessment during the vaccine life cycle.
Brighton Collaboration will support CEPI 2.0 by providing a harmonized vaccine safety assessment and monitoring service for CEPI and its awardees,in as many geographic regions where emerging pathogen vaccine studies will be conducted with a focus on low and middle inclome countries.

Guiding Principles

The Collaboration Abides by the Following Principles:

Altruism – To serve the needs of the global community concerned with immunization safety.

Collaboration – To work together effectively by promoting good internal and external communications through open decision making and teamwork.

Worldwide Participation – To promote global participation.

Independence – To keep the Brighton Collaboration scientifically independent.

Multidisciplinary Approach – To involve people of different skills and backgrounds, in order to benefit and build upon their contributions.

Generalizability – To minimize bias by adhering to a strict scientific approach, ensuring broad participation and avoiding conflicts of interest.

Relevance – To maintain Brighton documents up-­to-­date by identifying and incorporating the highest achievable quality of clinical evidence.

Accessibility of Work – To facilitate access to Brighton documents through strategic alliances and choice of media.

Responsiveness –To provide high quality information by being open and responsive to criticism.

Continuity – To maintain continuity of responsibility for Brighton documents and key functions.

Accessibility – To allow broad participation in the work of the Brighton Collaboration by minimizing obstacles to contributing and promoting diversity.

Our Priorities

We provide the vaccine community with the best possible information so they can make the best possible decisions. Our five scientific priority areas include:

1. Setting standards

Our case definitions, guidelines and protocols intend to enhance data comparability within and across clinical trials, surveillance systems, and post-licensure clinical studies.

2. Clinical assessment

We leverage our community’s expertise for rapid information exchange.

3. Data sharing

We promote the conduct of international collaborative observational studies.

4. Public confidence

We harmonize and develop new methods for public and social media monitoring and share information about emerging misinformation.

5. Capacity building

We enhance local vaccine safety expertise through collaborative projects and knowledge transfer.

 

Photo by Billy Weeks for PIVI. Laos, 2017.

History

  • CEPI and Brighton Collaboration launched SPEAC 2.0 in November 2022 to align SPEAC’s work with CEPI’s new 100 Days Mission to dramatically reduce the time it takes to deliver a vaccine against a pandemic pathogen. SPEAC 2.0 continues the project’s original work in DSMB and scientific coordination for Disease/AESI X while also supporting outreach to low- and middle-income countries and facilitating rapid response.
2022

  • The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funds the CARESAFE project within COVID-19 Vaccine Introduction Program (COVIP) for low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) to pilot several approaches to strengthen their capacity for pharmacovigilance of COVID-19 vaccine and adverse events following immunization (AEFI)/if special interest (AESI).”
2021

  • The World Health Organization (WHO) Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) recommended that “any review of the safety of new vaccines be based on the appropriate Brighton Collaboration standardized templates for benefit–risk assessment of vaccines (by technology platforms) when available and approved, which offer a structured approach to evaluating safety”.
2020

  •  The World Health Organization (WHO) Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) recommended that “any review of the safety of additional vector-based Ebola virus vaccines should be based on the Brighton Collaboration vector template, as it offers a structured approach to evaluating safety”.
  • The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the Brighton Collaboration launch the Safety Platform for Emergency vACcines (SPEAC) Project.
  • The Brighton Collaboration has been dissolved as a Partnership under Swiss law and reconstituted as a programme of the Task Force for Global Health (TFGH; www.taskforce.org).
2019

  • Relaunch of the new Brighton Collaboration Website and the Virtual Institute ACADEMY.
  • The Brighton Collaboration Foundation signs a Memorandum of Understanding with Taiwan Centers for Disease Control.
  • The Brighton Collaboration Foundation and the Hochschule Hannover launched an internship project. Three students (BA Medical Information Management) were hosted successfully.
  • The GAIA project has been completed successfully and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has provided funding for a project extension (GAIA Phase II).
2017

Results of the international study investigating the association of Influenza H1N1 Vaccine with narcolepsy are presented to the WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety.

2016

  • GAIA Network for Global Alignment of Immunisation safety Assessment in pregnancy established.
  • Vaccine Module of European Joint Master Program in Paediatric Drug Development and Evaluation created and delivered.   
2015

  • Clinical Advisory Forum of Experts (CAFE) is launched as a real-time exchange platform for vaccine safety professionals worldwide.
  • Templates for documenting the safety of Viral Vector Vaccines created.             
  • Brighton Collaboration Online Journal Club formalised to promote open and transparent scientific debate of current issues in vaccine safety.
2013

  • Brighton Collaboration instrumental in building ADVANCE consortium.  
  • The Vaccine Safety Quarterly provides news and information from the volunteering Brighton Collaboration network and reaches over 4000 members of the Brighton Collaboration.
  • Vaccine.GRID established as independent foundation and dedicated platform for the conduct of large-scale international observational vaccine safety and benefit-risk studies.
  • International symposium on innovations in vaccine safety monitoring in Shanghai.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) request worldwide study on narcolepsy (SOMNIA).   
2012

  • The Brighton Foundation US is registered in Boston, Massachusetts as a public charity and associated partner to the Brighton Collaboration Foundation, Switzerland.
  • First ever international risk assessment study based on one protocol and one data sharing infrastructure published based on over 30 Million population: Guillain-Barre Syndrome following pandemic influenza H1N1 vaccine.  
  • First ever international background rate studies based on one protocol and one data sharing infrastructure: A dozen adverse events of special interest based on over 260 Million person years.
  • World Health Organization (WHO) vaccine safety strategy (Vaccine Safety Blueprint) published. Brighton Collaboration was development partner.
2011

  • Brighton Collaboration contributes to World Health Organization (WHO) Global Vaccine Safety Landscape Analysis.
  • 2009 Pilot of European Vaccine Safety Data Network launched on request of ECDC.      
  • General guidelines for the collection, analysis, and publication of vaccine safety data in surveillance systems and clinical trials.
2010

  • First method for evaluating case definitions established and published.         
  • Computer-based classification of adverse events is automated. The ABC-Tool is available on the website.
  • The European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommends the use of Brighton Collaboration standards.   
2008

  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends the use of Brighton Collaboration case definitions.
2007

  • European Center of Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) joins as observer and funding agency.
  • American Academy of Pediatrics references the Brighton Collaboration in its infectious disease reference manual, the Redbook.
2006

  • UN Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) recommends the use of Brighton Collaboration case definitions and guidelines.
2005

  • Foundation creates first online collaboration platform.
  • First scientific publications of the Brighton Collaboration including first six case definitions of adverse events following immunisation.  
2004

  • Brighton Collaboration Foundation is founded as a Swiss NPO with international scope, established with seed capital of the University Children’s Hospital Basel (UKBB).
2003

  • The network has become global with several hundred active participants coming from all continents.
2002

  • The Brighton Method for defining adverse events following immunization was established.
2001

  • Official launch meeting of the Brighton Collaboration in Verona. Kathrin Kohl, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and Jan Bonhoeffer, University Children’s Hospital Basel (UKBB) were appointed to build an international network and coordinate activities.
  • WHO joins as observer and funding agency.
2000

  • Robert Chen called for improving the quality of vaccine safety data at a Vaccine Conference in Brighton, England. Harald Heijbel, Ulrich Heininger, Tom Jefferson, and Elisabeth Loupi joined to address this need.
1999

The Brighton Method

Our Workflow of Developing Case Definitions and Complementary Guidelines

International consensus is achieved through a global network of individuals and organizations concerned with immunization safety or with associated medical and methodological aspects. The resulting accrual of expertise and the sharing of knowledge within and outside the Collaboration along with the availability of case definitions and guidelines will lead to data comparability. This will benefit vaccine recipients, scientists, health officials and healthcare providers, who need to obtain, interpret, provide, and report information on immunization safety and make scientifically sound decisions.

Format

For each defined adverse event following immunization (AEFI) a document is developed including four sections:

  • A preamble to highlight the rationale for essential decisions made and to briefly describe the methodology of how working groups arrived at a particular Brighton document.
  • The case definition itself, which is structured in a three-level format taking into account current scientific evidence and different levels of resources available in different research and geographic settings.
  • Guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of a given AEFI.
  • References for selected points discussed in the preamble.
Step-By-Step: Developing Case Definitions and Complementary Guidelines
Selection of Topic
AEFI Prioritization
Based on severity, frequency of reporting, enhanced public interest and emerging scientific needs.
Working Groups
Call for Volunteers
Announcement on our website, contacting of pertinent scientific authors and request for referrals.
Composition of Groups
Based on the balanced composition of professional expertise and geographical location.
Exploratory Review
Inventory
Systematic search and compilation of relevant published and unpublished evidence.
Exploratory Review
Inventory
Systematic search and compilation of relevant published and unpublished evidence.
Assessment
Evaluation of inventory through discussions by the Working Group.
Draft Definition
Consensus
A draft document is developed based on the exploratory review and group consensus.
Reference Group
Call for Reviewers
Announcement on our website, contacting of pertinent scientific authors and request for referrals.
Peer Review
Survey
An online survey guides structured review of the draft document to stimulate critical review.
Assessment
Survey data are compiled and discussed by the Working Group.
Finalization
Modification
The draft is revised based on Reference Group comments.
Harmonization
The final document is harmonized with other case definition documents.
Maintenance
Cyclical Revision
Case definition documents are revised in 3-5 year intervals or upon the availability of new scientific information or critical feedback from evaluation and implementation of documents.

Constitution and Regulations

Review our constitution and regulations!

Overview of the
Project activities

The group of experts involved in the SPEAC Project works on different tasks that complement each other to contribute to build more vaccine safety capacity and solutions to achieve the project's objectives.

Data Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) for vaccines are typically composed of target disease experts, statisticians, and infectious disease specialists. Unfortunately, vaccine safety expertise is frequently missing.

SPEAC aims to contribute to that gap through DSMB support for vaccine developers and what SPEAC calls the Meta-DSMB:

DSMB Support for vaccine developers

SPEAC has created a pool of eligible candidates for DSMBs who are now available to CEPI-funded developers conducting trials in Africa and SE Asia contributing to the Research Preparedness Network initiative included in CEPI 2.0 plans for Clinical Development.

The pool has been continuously expanded through a training course conducted in priority geographic regions as one of the tasks within the SPEAC project.

Meta-DSMB

The meta-DSMB is a group of experts that monitors the safety profile of vaccines across all CEPI-funded clinical awardees by looking at patterns possibly related to vaccine platforms, antigens, adjuvants across trials.

The group comprises 16 global liaison members that attend the different awardees’ DSMBs as non-voting observers. They provide input on request and review reasons to stop/pause the enrolment of individual trials based on safety data and assess impact for similar vaccines/vectors.

A key task of the SPEAC project has been and continues to be the identification of ‘potential’ Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) that could occur during vaccine development of the he CEPI prioritized pathogens including Lassa Fever, MERS, Rift Valley Fever, Nipah, Chikungunya, COVID-19. These AESIs were identified based on based on vaccine safety evidence and target disease pathogenesis and the main objective is to

Once the AESIs have been identified, the work of the Standards and Tools work package in SPEAC focuses on ensuring the availability of the related resources below:

  • Brighton Collaboration case definitions
  • Risk factors for AESI occurrence to guide investigation & causality assessment
  • Population based background incidence of AESI to facilitate ‘expected’ vs ‘observed’ signal assessments
  • Medical codes (ICD, MedDRA, SNOMeD) to enable database searches for an AESI
  • Case report forms and algorithms to assist uniform application of available data to apply the case definition

The main goal of the above process that harmonized lists of prioritized AESIs together with their related standardized case definitions, resources and tools are available for global use across the vaccine life cycle, especially in the context of pandemics and/or outbreaks.

SEE ALL TOOLS

Effective communication of key information among key stakeholders including regulators, public health, and the general public is challenging due to highly subspecialized research with many acronyms, and the lack of specialized training in data supporting vaccine safety by many key stakeholders. That ends app leading to delays in regulatory approval and diminished public acceptance.  

In that context SPEAC started to develop standardized templates with key benefit/risk assessment considerations.  

Templates can function as a checklist for risk management of complicated activities and might help prioritize future research despite the inevitable gaps in current data. They can facilitate provision of key benefit/risk data for policymakers and for regulators to support the decisions for early authorization in case of emergency use. 

SEE THE PUBLISHED VACCINE TEMPLATES AND LEARN MORE

Digital Transformation (DT) is an industry best practice to advance vaccine discovery, clinical trials, regulatory approval, market distribution, and safety monitoring.  Effective DT results in modernization of technology platforms and emergence of science-based informatics tools for vaccine developers. 

In the context of SPEAC the project, one of the objectives is to create a SPEAC Safety Services Portal to accelerates the distribution and adoption of SPEAC best practice products and services to stakeholders. 

The team will also focus on building data-driven connections between SPEAC products to facilitate collaboration as well as synergy around development and deployment of products by SPEAC; and for distribution of products to partners.

There is a need for better understanding of the unique aspects of special populations in the life cycle of vaccines for emergent and epidemic/pandemic infectious diseases, as well as for the timely assessment of special populations’ disease burden to assess their risk in the early phases of a new disease emergence and for prompt inclusion of special populations in vaccine research and implementation as opposed to exclusion from early research, and late implementation 

The SPEAC project team activities related to special populations include: 

  • Identifying any special populations of relevance for the CEPI prioritized pathogens, and the workstreams of experts for each of the identified special populations.
  • Ensuring the inclusion of special populations in the process of vaccine development, evaluation, and implementation to contribute to CEPI’s objectives. 
  • Supporting key stakeholders throughout the process of vaccine development, evaluation, and implementation for special populations. Tools will be developed and made accessible to facilitate the timely inclusion of special populations in the development, evaluation, and implementation of vaccines for selected emerging pathogens.
  • Facilitating the interaction and integration of goals set up by SPEAC by providing special population level expertise.

The objective of this work package is to contribute to strategies for the generation of evidence of safety at CEPI Research Preparedness, as well as to strengthen the sustainability of such activities as it is critical for ongoing benefit-risk evaluation.  

The fulfil its objective the main tasks of this SPEAC work package will focus on: 

  • Planning for rapid landscape assessment that profiles the current state of current and planned active surveillance in LMICs identified by CEPI Research Preparedness Network sites, including identification of critical gaps and obstacles to sustainability.
  • Defining the requirements and the assessment of the capacity of these Network sites for active safety surveillance of vaccines.
  • Integrating the CEPI Research Preparedness Network sites into existing networks of vaccine safety, promoting coordination and leveraging the efforts of others. 

In the updated WHO R&D Blueprint list of priority diseases in February 2018, “Disease X” was included. “Disease X” is a term used to describe the possibility of a severe global epidemic caused by a pathogen that is not currently known to cause human disease and due to its unpredictable nature it is difficult to anticipate where it is likely to emerge or what it may be.

However, new diseases frequently arise from various parts of the world, particularly in developing countries with high levels of biodiversity. Such countries are at a greater risk of outbreaks due to their limited capacity for surveillance and response. COVID-19 is an example of “Disease X,” and as it has demonstrated, diseases do not respect borders. To respond to future outbreaks effectively, we must be prepared on a global scale.

SPEAC has funds that enable timely acute response to emergency vaccine safety issues; either ​ during the development of candidate vaccine(s) against a new Disease X, or ​during the rollout of such new vaccines to larger populations when new AESI X might first emerge.

INVESTORS & PARTNERS

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla suscipit, turpis ac posuere aliquet,

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla suscipit, turpis ac posuere aliquet, mauris turpis congue arcu, eget porta justo massa ac felis. 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla suscipit, turpis ac posuere aliquet, mauris turpis congue arcu, eget porta justo massa ac felis. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla suscipit, turpis ac posuere aliquet, mauris turpis congue arcu, eget porta justo massa ac felis. 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla suscipit, turpis ac posuere aliquet, mauris turpis congue arcu, eget porta justo massa ac felis. 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla suscipit, turpis ac posuere aliquet, mauris turpis congue arcu, eget porta justo massa ac felis. 

CONTACT US

CEPI is actively interested in discussing potential involvement with governments, funders, industry partners, academia, regulators, civil society organisations, and vaccine research groups. If you’re a journalist and want to know more about our work, please get in touch.

DSMB Support and Meta-DSMB

Data Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) for vaccines are typically composed of target disease clinical trial experts, statisticians, and infectious disease specialists. Unfortunately, individuals with vaccine safety expertise are sometimes difficult to identify.   Additionally, safety signals may be missed in single small trials.

SPEAC aims to help fill s these gaps through DSMB support for vaccine developers and  the SPEAC Meta-DSMB:

DSMB Support for vaccine developers

SPEAC has created a pool of eligible candidates for DSMBs who are now available to CEPI-funded developers conducting trials in Africa and SE Asia and contributing to the Research Preparedness Network initiative included in CEPI 2.0 plans for Clinical Development.  

The pool has been continuously expanded through a training course conducted in priority geographic regions as one of the tasks within the SPEAC project. 

Meta-DSMB

The meta-DSMB is a group of vaccine clinical trial experts that monitors the safety profile of vaccines across all CEPI-funded clinical awardees by looking at patterns possibly related to vaccine platforms, antigens, or adjuvants across trials.   

The group comprises 17 global liaison members who attend the different awardees’ DSMB meetings as non-voting observers. They provide guidance on request and review reasons to stop/pause the enrolment of individual trials based on safety data and assess impact for similar vaccines/platforms/adjuvants. 

COMPLETION OF VACCINE SAFETY TEMPLATES

Effective communication of key information among key stakeholders including regulators, public health, and the general public is challenging due to highly subspecialized research with many acronyms, and the lack of specialized training in data supporting vaccine safety by many key stakeholders. That ends app leading to delays in regulatory approval and diminished public acceptance.

In that context SPEAC started to develop standardized templates with key benefit/risk assessment considerations.

Templates can function as a checklist for risk management of complicated activities and might help prioritize future research despite the inevitable gaps in current data. They can facilitate provision of key benefit/risk data for policymakers and for regulators to support the decisions for early authorization in case of emergency use.

DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE SPEAC TOOLS AND SOLUTIONS

Digital Transformation (DT) is an industry best practice to advance vaccine discovery, clinical trials, regulatory approval, market distribution, and safety monitoring. Effective DT results in modernization of technology platforms and emergence of science-based informatics tools for vaccine developers.

In the context of SPEAC the project, one of the objectives is to create a SPEAC Safety Services Portal to accelerates the distribution and adoption of SPEAC best practice products and services to stakeholders.

The team will also focus on building data-driven connections between SPEAC products to facilitate collaboration as well as synergy around development and deployment of products by SPEAC; and for distribution of products to partners.

INCLUSION OF SPECIAL POPULATIONS

The main goal of the above process that harmonized lists of prioritized AESIs together with their related standardized case definitions, resources and tools are available for global use across the vaccine life cycle, especially in the context of pandemics and/or outbreaks. 

There is a need for better understanding of the unique aspects of special populations in the life cycle of vaccines for emergent and epidemic/pandemic infectious diseases, as well as for the timely assessment of special populations’ disease burden to assess their risk in the early phases of a new disease emergence and for prompt inclusion of special populations in vaccine research and implementation as opposed to exclusion from early research, and late implementation. 

The SPEAC project team activities related to special populations include: 

DISEASE X

In the updated WHO R&D Blueprint list of priority diseases in February 2018, “Disease X” was included. “Disease X” is a term used to describe the possibility of a severe global epidemic caused by a pathogen that is not currently known to cause human disease and due to its unpredictable nature it is difficult to anticipate where it is likely to emerge or what it may be.

However, new diseases frequently arise from various parts of the world, particularly in developing countries with high levels of biodiversity. Such countries are at a greater risk of outbreaks due to their limited capacity for surveillance and response. COVID-19 is an example of “Disease X,” and as it has demonstrated, diseases do not respect borders. To respond to future outbreaks effectively, we must be prepared on a global scale.

SPEAC has funds that enable timely acute response to emergency vaccine safety issues; either during the development of candidate vaccine(s) against a new Disease X, or during the rollout of such new vaccines to larger populations when new AESI X might first emerge.

DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARDS AND TOOLS

A key task of the SPEAC project has been and continues to be the identification of ‘potential’ Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) that could occur during vaccine development of the he CEPI prioritized pathogens including Lassa Fever, MERS, Rift Valley Fever, Nipah, Chikungunya, COVID-19. These AESIs were identified based on based on vaccine safety evidence and target disease pathogenesis and the main objective is to  

Once the AESIs have been identified, the work of the Standards and Tools work package in SPEAC focuses on ensuring the availability of the related resources below:  

The main goal of the above process that harmonized lists of prioritized AESIs together with their related standardized case definitions, resources and tools are available for global use across the vaccine life cycle, especially in the context of pandemics and/or outbreaks.

SUPPORT FOR VACCINE ACTIVE SAFETY SURVEILLANCE AT CEPI RESEARCH PREPAREDNESS NETWORK SITES

SPEAC undertakes a series of activities aimed at facilitating the development of safety evidence at CEPI Research Preparedness Network Sites. In addition, SPEAC strives to enhance the sustainability of these activities, which are essential for continuous benefit-risk assessment.

The key activities of SPEAC in achieving this objective include: